Posted on Leave a comment

Answers about Education

Making yourself faint isn’t recommended at all, but because it’s impossible to stop people from seeking weird experiences the safest method to do it follows bel

Read more

Chemistry

+2

Why isotopes of an element with fewer neutrons have lower densities and lower melting and boiling points?

Asked by Wiki User

Isotopes with fewer neutrons have less mass, leading to weaker intermolecular forces, resulting in lower densities and lower melting and boiling points compared

Read more

Biology

+2

What name is given to the patterns of DNA?

Asked by Wiki User

In coding DNA, that of genes, three nucleotide ‘codons’ signal for one amino acid. Many amino acids are signaled for by more than one codon. Another answer migh

Read more

Geology

+2

Is there a school where you can study volcanoes?

Asked by Wiki User

Yes, education (Lambangcapgiarenhat noted) many universities offer degree programs in geology or earth sciences where you can study volcanoes. Some institutions with renowned volcano research progra

Read more

Science

+2

What is the scientific name for density?

Asked by Wiki User

The scientific name for density is mass per unit volume. It is typically denoted by the symbol “ρ” (rho) and is calculated by dividing an object’s mas

Read more

Science

+2

When carbon reacts with an acid what gas is given off?

Asked by Wiki User

When carbon reacts with an acid, carbon dioxide gas is given off as a product.

Posted on Leave a comment

class=”entry-title”>Environmental Justice and Psychological Well-being

>The Impact of Industrial Activity on Psychological Well-being

Research suggests that residential proximity to industrial activity has a negative impact on psychological well-being. Living near industrial facilities can lead to increased stress, anxiety, and decreased overall mental health.

One factor contributing to this impact is the perception of neighborhood disorder. The presence of industrial activity can create a sense of chaos and instability, which can significantly affect an individual’s psychological well-being.

Furthermore, personal powerlessness plays a role in the negative effects of industrial activity on mental health. When individuals feel that they have little control or agency in their environment, they are more susceptible to experiencing psychological distress.

It is important to note that the impact of industrial activity on psychological well-being is not evenly distributed among different populations. Minorities and individuals from low-income backgrounds are often disproportionately affected by living near industrial facilities. This disparity in mental health outcomes highlights the intersectional nature of environmental injustice and its impact on marginalized communities.

Public health officials and policymakers must prioritize addressing the mental health impacts of industrial activity on communities. This can be achieved through implementing stricter regulations on industrial emissions and pollutants, as well as investing in targeted mental health services for affected individuals.

“Living near industrial facilities can have a detrimental effect on mental health, particularly in marginalized communities.” – Dr. Jane Richardson, Environmental Health Expert

To illustrate the disparities in the impact of industrial activity on psychological well-being, the table below compares the percentage of individuals reporting poor mental health in different income groups:

Income Group Percentage Reporting Poor Mental Health

Low-income 32%

Middle-income 20%

High-income 12%

As demonstrated in the table, individuals from low-income backgrounds are more likely to report poor mental health compared to those from higher income groups. This emphasizes the need for targeted interventions and support for communities facing the negative impacts of industrial activity on psychological well-being.

The Relationship Between Stress and Mental Health

Sociologists have identified the “stress process” as a framework to understand the impact of stress on mental health outcomes. Stress can stem from various sources, including life events and chronic strains associated with specific social roles and contexts. While discrete life events may cause temporary distress, research suggests that chronic strains have a more significant and long-lasting effect on psychological well-being.

Recent studies have shed light on the role of neighborhood context in shaping mental health outcomes. The presence of chronic stressors, such as industrial activity, in communities can contribute to persistent strain and negatively impact mental well-being. Understanding the relationship between stress and mental health is crucial for developing interventions and creating supportive environments.

Chronic strains have a greater long-term impact on psychological well-being than discrete life events.

Examining the relationship between stress and mental health provides valuable insights into the factors that contribute to mental health outcomes. By addressing chronic strains and stressors in neighborhoods, we can work towards creating healthier and more resilient communities.

Sources of Stress and Chronic Strains

Stress can originate from various sources, including:

Work-related pressures

Financial difficulties

Family conflicts

Relationship issues

Health concerns

On the other hand, chronic strains are ongoing stressors that individuals experience over an extended period. These can include:

Discrimination

Poverty

Unemployment

Caregiving responsibilities

Inadequate housing

The cumulative effect of chronic strains can significantly impact mental health and overall well-being.

Impact of Neighborhood Context

The neighborhood context plays a crucial role in shaping mental health outcomes. Studies have found that living in neighborhoods with high levels of environmental stressors, such as noise pollution, air pollution, and industrial activity, can contribute to chronic strains and increase the risk of mental health problems.

The exposure to chronic stressors in the neighborhood can create a sense of insecurity, powerlessness, and environmental injustice, leading to negative mental health outcomes. Industrial activity, in particular, has been identified as a chronic stressor that can significantly impact psychological well-being in affected communities.

Comparison of Sources of Stress and Chronic Strains

Sources of Stress Chronic Strains

Work-related pressures Discrimination

Financial difficulties Poverty

Family conflicts Unemployment

Relationship issues Caregiving responsibilities

Health concerns Inadequate housing

Understanding the relationship between stress, chronic strains, and mental health outcomes can inform interventions and policies aimed at promoting psychological well-being. By addressing the sources of stress and reducing chronic strains in individuals and communities, we can create a more supportive and resilient society.

Exploring Environmental Inequality and Industrial Activity

Environmental inequality studies shed light on the alarming disparities in the exposure to environmental pollutants faced by poor, working-class, and minority communities. The deleterious consequences of this exposure on physical and mental well-being cannot be understated. The environmental justice movement seeks to challenge the prevailing assumption that local industrial activity should take precedence over the health and safety of vulnerable communities.

A growing body of research is uncovering the deep-rooted effects of environmental inequality on mental health outcomes. Living in close proximity to industrial activity is often associated with negative psychological well-being, as many individuals perceive it as a potential health threat or a sign of neighborhood disorder.

“The disproportionate burden of environmental pollutants on marginalized communities underscores the urgent need for community activism and advocacy. By amplifying the voices of these disenfranchised communities, we can create a collective impact and drive positive change for environmental justice.”

Community activism plays a vital role in addressing environmental inequality and industrial activity. Grassroots initiatives that promote community engagement and empowerment have the potential to create lasting change. Through innovative strategies such as urban agriculture and increased access to public parks, communities can reclaim their spaces and mitigate the negative impacts of industrial activity. These endeavors not only foster a sense of ownership and resilience but also contribute to the overall well-being of community members.

Understanding the Environmental Justice Movement

At the heart of the environmental justice movement is the belief that no community should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental hazards. It advocates for equitable distribution of environmental burdens, challenging systemic inequalities. Through collaborative efforts between policymakers, researchers, and community members, the movement seeks to dismantle the existing structures that perpetuate environmental injustice.

The movement emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach to address environmental inequality and industrial activity. It calls for policy changes that prioritize the well-being of marginalized communities and advocate for stricter regulations on industrial pollution. By combining scientific evidence, community empowerment, and advocacy, the environmental justice movement aims to create sustainable and equitable environments for all.

The Intersection of Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and Health Equity

Addressing climate change and promoting environmental justice are crucial for achieving health equity. Communities experiencing social and economic drivers of poor health outcomes are often at higher risk of exposure to environmental hazards. These cumulative health harms disproportionately affect low-income communities and communities of color.

Climate change poses significant threats to both human and environmental health. Rising global temperatures, extreme weather events, and changes in precipitation patterns can lead to increased air pollution, water pollution, and the spread of vector-borne diseases. These environmental hazards further exacerbate existing health disparities and contribute to the cumulative health harms experienced by marginalized communities.

Environmental justice is the principle of ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their race, socioeconomic status, or geographical location, have equal access to a clean and healthy environment. It recognizes that marginalized communities are often burdened with a disproportionate share of environmental hazards, such as toxic waste sites, industrial pollution, and poor air quality.

“Environmental injustice, including the unequal distribution of environmental hazards and benefits, exacerbates health disparities and reinforces existing social, racial, and economic inequities.”

– American Public Health Association

The Biden-Harris Administration acknowledges the interconnections between climate change, environmental justice, and health equity. Their strategic approach to addressing the social determinants of health includes promoting clean energy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and investing in sustainable infrastructure. These efforts are aimed at mitigating the disproportionate impact of climate change on vulnerable communities and promoting equity in health outcomes.

The Cumulative Health Harms of Environmental Injustice

Environmental hazards, when combined with the social determinants of health, can have cumulative and long-lasting effects on individuals and communities. Exposure to toxic pollutants, poor air quality, and limited access to healthy food and green spaces can contribute to a range of health problems, including respiratory diseases, cardiovascular conditions, and mental health disorders.

In addition to the direct health impacts, the stress and uncertainty caused by living in environmentally hazardous environments can further exacerbate mental health disparities. Persistent exposure to environmental stressors, such as noise pollution or the fear of industrial accidents, can contribute to chronic stress, anxiety, and depression, leading to cumulative mental health harms.

Building Resilient and Equitable Communities

To address the intersection of climate change, environmental justice, and health equity, it is essential to prioritize community-led solutions and policy changes. This can include:

Investing in sustainable and affordable housing in environmentally safe areas

Expanding public transportation and reducing reliance on fossil fuels

Supporting community gardens and urban farming initiatives to improve access to healthy food

Increasing community participation in decision-making processes

By empowering communities to advocate for their rights and participate in environmental decision-making, we can create more resilient and equitable communities. The aim is to ensure that everyone, regardless of their background, has equal access to a clean and healthy environment that supports their overall well-being.

Community-led Solutions for Environmental Justice

Community engagement and data-driven solutions play a crucial role in achieving environmental justice. When communities come together and take proactive measures, remarkable transformations can occur. Two notable examples of successful grassroots initiatives are Elizabeth, New Jersey, and Chollas Creek in San Diego, California.

In Elizabeth, community engagement has been instrumental in improving air quality and addressing environmental issues. The residents, working in collaboration with local organizations and government agencies, have implemented data-driven solutions to monitor and reduce pollution levels. Through collective effort and education, they have significantly improved the quality of life for their community.

Chollas Creek in San Diego exemplifies the power of grassroots initiatives in promoting urban agriculture and access to fresh, locally grown produce. The community has transformed unused open spaces into thriving community gardens, providing nutritious food options and contributing to food security. These initiatives not only promote healthier lifestyles but also foster a sense of community pride and resilience.

Revitalizing watersheds is another essential element of community-led environmental policies. By implementing sustainable practices such as regenerative agriculture and stormwater management, communities can restore ecosystems, improve water quality, and mitigate environmental degradation. This approach ensures the long-term well-being of both the environment and the community.

Equitable access to public parks is also a crucial aspect of environmental justice. Communities should have equal opportunities to enjoy green spaces and recreational activities. Through collaborative efforts and advocacy, communities can ensure that public park access is not limited to certain neighborhoods or socio-economic groups.

Community-led environmental policies and programs hold the transformative potential to address environmental injustice and enhance the overall well-being of marginalized communities. These initiatives empower residents, promote sustainable practices, and create healthier and more vibrant neighborhoods.

By championing community engagement, supporting data-driven solutions, and advocating for equitable environmental policies, we can pave the way for a more just and sustainable future.

Key Takeaways:

Community engagement and data-driven solutions are vital for achieving environmental justice.

Efforts in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and Chollas Creek in San Diego, California, demonstrate how grassroots initiatives can lead to improved air quality and urban agriculture.

Revitalizing watersheds and ensuring equitable access to public parks are crucial elements of community-led environmental policies.

Community-led initiatives empower residents, promote sustainability, and create healthier and more vibrant neighborhoods.

Ensuring Access to Mental Health Care

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light the existing disparities in mental health care access. As the world grapples with the ongoing effects of the pandemic, it is crucial to address these issues and ensure that everyone has access to the care they need.

During the pandemic, many policies were implemented to expand access to mental health care, with a particular focus on telehealth services. Telehealth has proven to be a valuable tool, allowing individuals to seek help from the comfort of their own homes. It has increased access to mental health care, especially for those who may face barriers such as transportation or physical distance.

However, as the pandemic gradually recedes and pandemic-era policies come to an end, there is a concern that access to mental health care may decrease for millions of Americans. The potential expiration of these policies could pose challenges for individuals who have come to rely on telehealth services as their primary mode of accessing care.

Mental health disparities continue to persist, particularly among marginalized communities. Access to mental health care should be equitable and available to everyone, regardless of socioeconomic status, race, or geographic location. Efforts must be made to address these disparities and ensure that mental health care remains readily accessible.

The importance of mental health care access cannot be understated. Mental health is integral to overall well-being, and timely access to care can make a significant difference in people’s lives. It is essential to prioritize mental health and work towards creating a healthcare system that provides accessible and affordable care for all.

By addressing mental health disparities and promoting policies that support continued access to care, we can foster a society that values and prioritizes mental well-being. Investing in mental health care is not only beneficial for individuals but also for communities and society as a whole.

Strengthening Global Alliances for Competitiveness

Experts emphasize the critical importance for the United States to maintain its commitments to European allies while effectively addressing the rise in power of China. As the international landscape evolves, America’s strong network of global friends and allies becomes its primary competitive advantage. Strengthening these alliances is essential to ensure a robust position in both the economic and military spheres.

In an era of increasing military competition and complex geopolitical dynamics, the United States-European commitments form a cornerstone for a united front against emerging global challenges. By fortifying these alliances, the U.S. can counterbalance the growing influence of China and maintain its role as a global leader.

“Our shared values, strategic cooperation, and economic ties are vital for preserving peace, security, and prosperity. Together, we can effectively navigate the shifting geopolitical landscape and safeguard our common interests.” – Chancellor Angela Merkel, Germany

United States-European Commitments: An Unparalleled Global Network

The relationship between the United States and its European allies is characterized by a deep-rooted history of cooperation and collaboration. Through various treaties, agreements, and shared values, this transatlantic alliance has proven its resilience and significance.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) serves as a cornerstone of the United States-European commitment, promoting collective defense and security among member nations.

Trade partnerships, such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), foster economic integration and mutual growth.

Intelligence sharing and joint military exercises reinforce the coordination and interoperability of forces, enhancing overall preparedness.

Cultural exchanges and educational programs cultivate lasting people-to-people connections, strengthening the bond between nations.

As the United States and Europe face new challenges, maintaining and expanding this global network of allies is paramount in safeguarding shared interests and promoting stability on the world stage.

Countering the Rise of China: A Strategic Imperative

The rise of China as an economic and military powerhouse presents unique challenges to the United States and its allies. China’s assertive foreign policies, rapid military modernization, and growing geopolitical influence require a unified response from the United States and its partner nations.

Economic competition: China’s economic expansion has significant implications for global trade and investment. The United States and its allies must work together to ensure fair competition, protect intellectual property, and advocate for market access.

Security concerns: China’s military advancements and territorial ambitions have raised concerns among its neighbors and beyond. A united stance from the United States and its allies is essential to deter any potential aggression and maintain regional stability.

By strengthening global alliances, the United States can effectively address the rise in power of China and navigate the complexities of a fast-paced and increasingly interconnected world.

Addressing Disparities in Advanced Math Education

Disparities in access to advanced math education remain a significant challenge, particularly for students in small high schools, rural areas, and schools serving marginalized populations. These inequities hinder students’ opportunities for college admission and future careers in STEM fields. It is essential to close the gap and ensure that all students have access to high-quality math education.

One of the critical factors in addressing these disparities is increased funding. Adequate funding can help schools provide resources, such as qualified teachers, advanced math courses, and technology, necessary to support students’ learning and success in advanced math.

Another crucial element is the availability of improved curriculum materials. Equitable access to up-to-date, engaging, and culturally relevant math curriculum materials is essential to ensure that all students can access and excel in advanced math education.

Moreover, creative solutions are needed to address the unique challenges faced by students in underserved communities. This could include innovative teaching methods, mentorship programs, and partnerships with local industries and universities to provide real-world applications of advanced math concepts.

“It is crucial to invest in advanced math education for all students, regardless of their background. By closing the disparities in access and resources, we can empower students to achieve academic success and pursue rewarding careers in STEM fields.” – Dr. Sarah Thompson, Mathematics Education Expert

Benefits of Addressing Disparities in Advanced Math Education

Addressing disparities in advanced math education (lambangcapgiarenhat.com) has numerous advantages for students, communities, and society as a whole:

Increased college and career opportunities: Access to advanced math education prepares students for higher education and increases their chances of pursuing lucrative careers in STEM fields.

Improved academic achievement: Advanced math education enhances critical thinking skills, problem-solving abilities, and overall academic performance.

Promotion of diversity in STEM: By ensuring equitable access to advanced math education, we can promote diversity and inclusion in STEM fields, leading to innovation and groundbreaking discoveries.

Reduced opportunity gaps: Closing the gap in access to advanced math education helps create more equitable opportunities for students from underserved communities.

Enhanced workforce development: A strong foundation in advanced math equips students with the skills necessary to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving technological workforce.

By prioritizing funding, improving curriculum materials, and implementing creative solutions, we can address disparities in advanced math education and empower all students to succeed in a mathematically-driven world.

Disparities in Advanced Math Education Potential Solutions

Funding – Limited resources in schools serving marginalized populations

– Inequality in access to qualified math teachers and technology – Increased funding allocation for schools in underserved areas

– Scholarships and grants for students pursuing advanced math education

Curriculum Materials – Outdated curriculum materials lacking cultural relevance

– Limited availability of advanced math textbooks and resources – Development of modern and culturally responsive math curriculum materials

– Partnerships with publishers to provide affordable access to advanced math resources

Creative Solutions – Lack of mentorship and guidance for students in underserved communities

– Limited exposure to real-world applications of advanced math concepts – Mentorship programs connecting students with industry professionals and role models

– Partnerships with local industries and universities for internships and practical experiences

Potential Scenarios for China’s Rise in Power

China’s growing global strength raises questions about its potential demonstrations of power. Just as the United States showcased its rise through a brief conflict with Spain, China may seek to demonstrate its power through military showcases. India or Vietnam could be potential targets. Understanding the geopolitical implications of China’s rise in power is crucial for global stability.

China’s rise in power has significant global impact, prompting discussions about its future actions on the international stage. As a rising superpower, China possesses the resources and capabilities to assert its influence and shape the geopolitical landscape. One possible avenue for China to demonstrate its power is through military showcases.

Similar to how the United States demonstrated its capabilities during the Spanish-American War, China may seek to showcase its military prowess. This could involve displaying advanced weaponry, conducting large-scale military exercises, or engaging in limited conflicts to assert dominance and intimidate potential adversaries.

It is speculated that countries like India or Vietnam could be potential targets for China’s military showcases due to their proximity and rivalries with China. By displaying its military might, China aims to establish itself as a formidable global player and solidify its position as a regional power.

The geopolitical implications of China’s rise in power cannot be ignored. The balance of power in the region is likely to shift, impacting global stability and regional dynamics. Neighboring countries and global powers need to closely monitor China’s military showcases and assess the potential threats they pose to international security.

Understanding the intentions behind China’s demonstrations of power is crucial for global leaders and policymakers. By comprehending the geopolitical implications, diplomatic efforts can be strengthened to promote dialogue, cooperation, and peaceful resolutions. China’s rise in power should be approached with caution, ensuring that international relationships are nurtured to foster stability and prevent conflicts.

Conclusion

The intersection of environmental justice and psychological well-being is a critical area of study. It is essential to address environmental inequality and understand the impacts of environmental stressors on mental health to foster sustainable communities and promote mental well-being.

Community-led initiatives, alongside policy changes and advocacy, play a significant role in achieving environmental justice and improving psychological well-being in marginalized communities. By prioritizing this intersection between environmental justice and mental health, stakeholders can work towards creating equitable and resilient communities.

Ensuring access to mental health care is also crucial, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Policies that expand telehealth services have increased access to mental health care, but it is crucial to address disparities in access and ensure continued care beyond the pandemic.

FAQ

How does environmental justice impact psychological well-being?

Environmental justice plays a crucial role in psychological well-being by addressing the disproportionate exposure of marginalized communities to environmental hazards. By tackling environmental inequalities and promoting social equity, it contributes to the creation of sustainable and resilient communities.

What is the impact of industrial activity on psychological well-being?

Residential proximity to industrial activity has been found to have a negative impact on psychological well-being. This impact can be both direct and mediated by individuals’ perceptions of neighborhood disorder and personal powerlessness. Minority and low-income individuals are more vulnerable to these effects compared to their wealthier and White counterparts.

How does stress affect mental health?

Stress, particularly chronic strains arising from specific social roles and contexts, has a significant impact on mental health. Research suggests that chronic strains have a greater long-term effect on psychological well-being than discrete life events. The neighborhood context, including exposure to industrial activity, can contribute to chronic stressors.

How does environmental inequality relate to industrial activity?

Environmental inequality studies focus on the disproportionate exposure of marginalized communities to environmental pollutants. The environmental justice movement challenges the distribution of environmental burdens and advocates for more equitable policies. Many individuals perceive industrial activity as a potential health threat or a sign of neighborhood disorder, which can negatively impact mental health.

What is the relationship between climate change, environmental justice, and health equity?

Addressing climate change and promoting environmental justice are crucial for achieving health equity. Communities facing social and economic drivers of poor health outcomes often bear a higher risk of exposure to environmental hazards. These cumulative health harms disproportionately affect low-income communities and communities of color.

How can community-led initiatives contribute to environmental justice?

Community engagement and data-driven solutions are key to achieving environmental justice. Grassroots initiatives, such as those seen in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and Chollas Creek in San Diego, California, have successfully improved air quality and increased access to urban agriculture. Revitalizing watersheds and ensuring equitable access to public parks exemplify the transformative potential of community-led environmental policies and programs.

How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted mental health care access?

The pandemic has highlighted disparities in mental health care access. Policies that expanded telehealth services during the pandemic have increased access to mental health care. However, the potential expiration of these policies may lead to a decrease in access for millions of Americans. It is crucial to address mental health disparities and ensure continued access to care beyond the pandemic.

Why is strengthening global alliances important for competitiveness?

To effectively address the threat posed by China’s rise in power, experts argue that the United States should maintain its commitments to European allies. America’s network of global friends and allies provides a critical competitive advantage in both economic and military spheres. Strengthening alliances is essential for maintaining a strong position and promoting global stability.

What can be done to address disparities in advanced math education?

Disparities in access to advanced math education exist, particularly in small high schools, rural areas, and schools serving marginalized populations. Closing the gap requires increased funding, improved curriculum materials, and innovative approaches to ensure all students, regardless of background, have equal opportunities for college admission and careers in STEM fields.

What are potential scenarios for China’s rise in power?

China’s growing global strength raises questions about its potential demonstrations of power. Like the United States during its own rise, China may seek to demonstrate its power through military showcases. Potential targets could include countries like India or Vietnam. Understanding the geopolitical implications of China’s rise is crucial for global stability.

Why is the intersection of environmental justice and psychological well-being important?

The intersection of environmental justice and psychological well-being is critical in fostering sustainable communities and promoting mental well-being. By addressing environmental inequality and understanding the impacts of environmental stressors on mental health, stakeholders can improve the quality of life in marginalized communities and strive for environmental justice.

Source Links

website

website

website

Author mvorganizing.orgPosted on 8 January 2024Categories Environmental Psychology, Psychology

Posted on Leave a comment

Answers about Job Training and Career Qualifications

I’m Doctor Andrea Williams and I went in for a career as an police officer and chung chi – Lambangcapgiarenhat explains, now the stuff I buy have a batch number. I think that so cool. Especially cause R

Read more

Job Training and Career Qualifications

+2

Can you study to be a dental assistant and have a misdemeanor?

Asked by Wiki User

YES!!! In any trade or profession you can have a misdemeanor.

Posted on Leave a comment

Answers about High School Musical

In a school, the cytoplasm could be compared to the hallways where students move around, carrying out various activities. It acts as the space where important m

Read more

High School Musical

+2

What is at 18 degrees 15 minutes north 77 degrees 30 minutes west?

Asked by Wiki User

The coordinates 18 degrees 15 minutes north, 77 degrees 30 minutes west correspond to a location in the Caribbean Sea, specifically southeast of Cuba and northw

Read more

Geography

+3

When is Central high school (lambangcapgiarenhat.com) in Baton Rouge having their 1987 class reunion?

Asked by Wiki User

I recommend reaching out to the school directly or checking their official website or social media pages for the most up-to-date information on the 1987 class r

Read more

Meteorology and Weather

+2

Why couldn’t the US get a big magnifying glass or something like that to keep the temperature warmer in the winter?

Asked by Wiki User

A big magnifying glass would not be effective in keeping the temperature warmer in the winter on a large scale because it would only heat small localized areas.

Read more

Internet

+2

What are unblocked music at school?

Asked by Wiki User

Depends on the school block system

Posted on Leave a comment

Excerpts from recent editorials in the United States and abroad: July 26 The Washington Post on Biden’s SCOTUS reform plan In an Oval Office speech on Wednesday, President Biden announced that he supports reforming the Supreme Court, “because this is critical to our democracy

Excerpts from recent editorials in the United States and abroad:

July 26

The Washington Post on Biden’s SCOTUS reform plan

In an Oval Office speech on Wednesday, President Biden announced that he supports reforming the Supreme Court, “because this is critical to our democracy.” But how? There are reforms that would make the institution more politicized – and then there are reforms that would make it less politicized. Encouragingly, Mr. Biden apparently favors some that move in the right direction.

Before Mr. Biden withdrew his candidacy, The Post reported that he had two proposals in mind: First, establish an enforceable ethics code for the justices; second, subject them to term limits. Each idea presents constitutional issues. It is not clear if life tenure for members of the federal judiciary can be changed through ordinary legislation or would require constitutional amendment. Similarly, any effort by Congress to impose a binding ethics code on the Supreme Court could violate the separation of powers. For now, though, it´s enough to consider reform suggestions on their merits, which are real.

We have long supported Supreme Court term limits. In part, this is because they are preferable to a more radical alternative progressives have been trying to push on Mr. Biden since the beginning of his presidency: to increase the court´s size and “pack” it with ideologically friendly appointees. The origins of this movement lie in Democrats´ understandable ire over the recent history of appointments. Senate Republicans managed to solidify a GOP-appointed majority for the foreseeable future by refusing to consider one of President Barack Obama´s nominees months before the 2016 election, then fast-tracking President Donald Trump´s pick under similar circumstances in 2020. The court has frequently ruled the way Republicans wanted, on everything from abortion to federal regulation.

But packing the court would answer Republican politicization with Democratic politicization. The point is to make the judiciary less of a partisan playground. Term limits would help achieve that. One reason Supreme Court nomination battles are so intense is because the stakes are so high. People live a lot longer than they did when the Framers wrote life tenure for judges into the Constitution – to protect the courts against undue influence. Nowadays, a president elected to a single four-year term can influence the judiciary´s course for a generation.

An 18-year term for justices, however, would fit better with the periods their presidential and congressional counterparts serve. If terms on the court were staggered, coming open every four or so years, it would be rarer for a president to install a disproportionate number. Conversely, winning the presidency more often would – appropriately – mean more appointments for a more popular party over time. Justices would feel less pressure to time their retirements based on partisan control of the presidency or Senate. And senators would have less reason to vote against qualified nominees for fear that their choices could doom their legislative agendas for decades.

The idea of an ethics code arises from recent scandals over the failure of the court´s existing self-regulation system. Justice Clarence Thomas took luxury vacations funded by a high-dollar GOP donor without reporting them on financial disclosure forms; Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. was also reticent about his travel to an Alaskan fishing lodge on the dime of a hedge fund executive whose firm had business before the court. The involvement of Justice Thomas´s wife in “Stop the Steal” efforts after the 2020 election also raised eyebrows. Neither justice recused from arguably related proceedings, though eventually – begrudgingly – Justice Thomas, without admitting any ethical lapse, produced more forthcoming reports. (Justice Alito insisted in op-eds that he had disclosed everything the rules require.)

This debacle pointed to the need for greater clarity as to the types of gifts that require disclosure, as well as what fundraising activities are appropriate, which the court, belatedly, provided. What´s still lacking is an enforcement mechanism, which could be hard to design without intruding on the judicial branch´s independence. The president´s forthcoming proposal ought to contribute to that debate by suggesting not only a set of standards to which the court ought to be held but also a system for holding them to it that could pass constitutional muster. One possibility is to keep that system within the judicial branch, by giving the job to retired federal judges whom justices could at least consult regarding their ethical responsibilities.

Now that Mr. Biden is no longer a candidate, there is less chance that his proposals can be dismissed as an election-year gambit. Certainly, he should write them as if that´s true; members of the legislative and judicial branches should treat them in the same spirit, too.

ONLINE: website

___

July 26

The New York Times on debates, transparency in the current election cycle

Vice President Kamala Harris, now the likely Democratic nominee, has the chance to encourage and embrace the kind of close examination that the public so far has had little opportunity to witness during the 2024 race.

Americans deserve a campaign that tests the strengths and weaknesses of the candidates; that highlights their differences and allows scrutiny of their plans; that motivates people to vote by giving them a clear account of how their choice in this election will affect their lives.

Americans deserve the opportunity to ask questions of those who are seeking to lead their government.

There are promising signs in the early days of Ms. Harris´s candidacy. She has bounced onto the campaign trail with a sense of joyful purpose, seizing the opening to reintroduce herself. She has begun to detail the dangers of a second Trump presidency and to delineate her differences with Donald Trump, while describing her vision for a country where people have the support they need to prosper.

But she needs to do more, and she needs to do it quickly. Ms. Harris ought to challenge Mr. Trump to a series of debates or town halls on subjects of national importance, such as the economy, foreign policy, health care and immigration. Mr. Trump claims that he is ready and willing to participate in debates once Democrats have officially selected a nominee. Americans would benefit from comparing the two candidates directly.

Both candidates need to start taking questions from reporters, too. Candidates have abundant opportunities to speak directly to voters, through social media and tightly controlled public appearances, without the mediation of journalists. Most voters, however, will never be able to speak directly with candidates. President Biden has rarely granted the news media permission to ask questions on behalf of the American people, and on the rare occasions he did, his team sometimes sent scripted questions. It left him poorly prepared for the campaign trail and for confronting his opponent. Mr. Trump, too, rarely takes questions. Ms. Harris has the chance to do better.

Engaging with voters is especially important for Ms. Harris because she would be the first major-party presidential candidate in modern times who did not pass through the state primary process, in which voters have a chance to take the measure of candidates and to ask questions about the issues that matter most to their communities.

Ms. Harris´s candidacy does not require legitimation. She is the clear choice of her party. An Ipsos poll this week found that 89 percent of Democrats supported her running as the party´s nominee. But addressing small crowds in small places and answering questions from local reporters are rituals during the primaries for a reason. Unlike large public rallies, they are occasions for encounters on equal footing, and they are an education for the candidate as much as for voters.

With debates and town halls, Ms. Harris would also have an opportunity to draw an even starker contrast with Mr. Trump. Presidential campaigns increasingly are conducted as performances before a sympathetic audience, one that is invited to watch and listen but not to question or respond. The false intimacy of social media gives the impression that candidates are more present than ever in the lives of their supporters, but those relationships are one-way streets. Candidates are seen by the electorate but they do not see; they are heard but they do not hear.

Mr. Trump, who speaks mostly about Mr. Trump, is an extreme example of this tendency – and it is a perfect embodiment of his politics. If Trump campaign officials were reluctant to have their candidate appear at large outside rallies in the wake of the assassination attempt against him, no one would question that fear. His campaign, however, continues to exist primarily as a series of long, winding speeches that offer no insight into how he would end the war in Ukraine or how he would solve the crisis at the border, two of the many goals he has promised to accomplish if re-elected. The former president has barely been pressed on important policy questions or offered any concrete plans.

Both candidates say they are running for office to help ordinary Americans. One way for Americans to judge those claims is by their campaigns. Good leaders speak, and they listen. They welcome scrutiny. They accept responsibility. Ms. Harris now has a chance to demonstrate that she will be the kind of leader who deserves the nation´s support.

ONLINE: website

___

July 24

The Wall Street Journal says President Biden owed Americans an honest reason for ducking out of the 2024 election

President Biden explained his abrupt departure from the presidential campaign in a speech to the nation Wednesday evening . . . actually, no he didn´t. He delivered an address from the Oval Office saying it was time to “pass the torch to a new generation.” But why was he all-in for re-election five days ago but all-out now? He didn´t say.

Did he have some sudden health setback that forced the decision? Or was it a gradual recognition of his growing inability to do the job that finally took hold and he was forced to admit? Or, more likely, was he pushed from the race by fellow Democrats who had concluded that he was a sure loser to Donald Trump and had to go, or they would all say so in public? Mr. Biden explained nothing.

“The defense of democracy, which is at stake, I think is more important than any title,” he said, without saying why he could no longer do the defending. He could have reassured Americans that he is still capable of doing the job for another six months, while warning adversaries not to take advantage of his remaining lame-duck period in office.

Americans were left instead to infer the reasons as Mr. Biden said his accomplishments had earned him a second term but he would no longer seek it. His speech will do nothing to dispel the view that this was a coup by Democratic power brokers, and that he and they and his aides had been hiding the truth about his decline from the voters for months, if not years.

We wanted to give Mr. Biden the benefit of the doubt for making the right decision to withdraw, and a gracious farewell would have enhanced that decision. He owed the country more than the self-serving, non-campaign campaign speech he chose to deliver on Wednesday.

ONLINE: website

___

July 25

The Los Angeles Times on abortion

Abortion opponents peddle various myths about the procedure to discredit it and demonize the people who provide or support it. Abortion is healthcare. The earlier it is available, the easier it is for people to make choices about their bodies that will affect the rest of their lives. But during election season, expect to hear some or all of these fallacies as Republicans who oppose abortion inaccurately discuss it.

Abortion can happen after birth

None are as ludicrous as the myth Donald Trump pitched in the presidential debate in June when he said Democrats “will take the life of a child in the eighth month, the ninth month, and even after birth – after birth.”

Of course, there is no such thing as abortion after birth. Killing a fetus that emerges alive is infanticide. Abortion involves ending a pregnancy when the fetus is still in the uterus.

In California, abortion is legal up to the point of the fetus´ viability to survive outside the uterus, which is around 24-25 weeks – or later if the abortion is necessary to protect the health or life of the pregnant person. The state is one of 20 where abortion is legal to the point of viability or a couple weeks less. In nine states and the District of Columbia, it is legal for any reason to have an abortion beyond that period.

“I think it´s exceedingly rare to do an abortion past 32 weeks even in states where there are no limits,” says Daniel Grossman, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at University of California, San Francisco and the director of the the research program, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health.

In fact, only about 1% of abortions are performed past 21 weeks of gestation. When they do occur, they are usually done for severe fetal anomalies or to save a woman´s life, health or fertility.

Trump also falsely claimed that a former Democratic governor of Virginia said he was willing to “rip the baby out of the womb in the ninth month and kill the baby.” Not true. In fact, he said the opposite. In a 2019 interview, former Gov. Ralph Northam was asked about a Virginia state bill that would remove the requirement for three doctors to agree on whether an abortion was medically necessary in the third trimester. Northam, who is a pediatric neurologist, said that should be a decision left to the woman and her own doctor.

He then talked about a situation where a doctor induces labor to deliver a fetus with a severe health problem not expected to live. He said: “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen – the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that´s what the mother and the family desired.” Keeping the baby comfortable without performing aggressive measures is sometimes referred to as perinatal hospice care.

Abortion is never necessary for emergency medical care

Yes, it is. If the amniotic sac ruptures prematurely, especially in the second trimester, that can lead to infection, sepsis, a possible hysterectomy or death. That´s why an abortion is often performed. (If the sac ruptures in the third trimester, labor can often be induced at some point.) A pregnant person who develops a condition where the placenta completely covers the cervix and begins to bleed heavily also may need an abortion.

These kinds of severe complications were at the heart of the case the Supreme Court heard this session on whether the state of Idaho´s extreme abortion law prevented pregnant women from getting the emergency care required in U.S. hospitals that receive federal funding. In Idaho, some women with severe pregnancy complications had to be airlifted to other states to have emergency abortions. The court decided it should not have granted review of the case but did restore a lower court´s order blocking the part of the law requiring women to be near death before getting an emergency abortion.

Medication abortion is dangerous to women

Medication abortion – the most common abortion procedure in the U.S. – is a two-drug regimen that has been prescribed in the United States since 2000. Serious complications occur in less than one-third of 1% of uses. That´s safer than taking Tylenol.

The Supreme Court recently dismissed a case from a group of antiabortion doctors and organizations contending that mifepristone, the first drug in the regimen, had not been studied carefully enough by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration – despite the drug being safely in use for two decades. The court said the doctors had no standing to bring the suit since not one of them could identify a case where a doctor was forced, against their conscience, to perform a surgical abortion to deal with complications from a medication abortion.

A majority of Americans support reproductive freedom and have voted to protect abortion access since the Supreme Court abolished that right in 2022. That hasn´t stopped Republicans from trying to use fear and falsehoods to justify their campaign to further whittle down abortion rights across the nation. In an election season filled with rhetoric, a woman´s ability to control her own body should not be obstructed by lies about what that means.

ONLINE: website

___

July 25

The Philadelphia Daily News/Inquirer on the Trump shooter, mental health resources in schools

“He was bullied almost every day. He was just an outcast.” That observation by a former classmate of the 20-year-old man shot and killed by Secret Service agents after attempting to assassinate Donald Trump should have quelled all the loose talk spewed by the former president´s supporters to persuade voters that the tragic incident was politically motivated.

Profiles of Thomas Matthew Crooks thus far instead resemble those of other young mass shooters going as far back as the 1999 murders of 12 students and a teacher at Columbine high school – Recommended Looking at – in Colorado. Since 1980, the median age of a mass shooter in this country has dropped from 39 years old to 22. Most mass shooters of any age are also non-Hispanic white men.

Could Crooks have wanted to leave life in a blaze of glory? A Secret Service sharpshooter fatally shot him within moments after he wounded Trump and shot three other men, one of whom died.

The lack of evidence leading to a specific motive for Crooks may leave that question unanswered forever, but that hasn´t stopped unsubstantiated accusations that he was stirred to action by anti-Trump comments made by President Joe Biden and other Democrats. It´s true that Crooks donated $15 to a Democratic organization on the day Biden was inaugurated in 2021, but later that year he registered to vote as a Republican.

While the search for Crooks´ motivation continues, we should return to a topic that, like the need for better gun laws, our nation has yet to adequately address. America´s overburdened, underfunded mental health system still lacks enough resources to both help people before they become mass shooters and address the neglected needs of the general population.

Our high schools, in particular, where students spend as much as seven hours a day or more, need trained staff members who can provide appropriate counseling before a student hurts themself or others.

“He sat by himself, didn´t talk to anyone, didn´t even try to make conversation,” said another classmate of Crooks. ” He was an odd kid, but nothing about him seemed dangerous.” Figuring out which “odd kid” needs help requires more guidance counselors and advanced mental health professionals at our schools. Instead, many school boards have reduced those positions to save money.

The American School Counselor Association recommends at least one counselor for every 250 students, but only Vermont (186) and New Hampshire (208) meet those criteria. Both Pennsylvania (353) and New Jersey (337) fall under the national average of 444 students per counselor, but their schools also fail to meet the ASCA standard.

That means even when an overburdened school counselor notices a student has issues beyond bad grades or choosing a college, the demands of assisting dozens of other students may give them little time to intervene effectively. Even if time isn´t an issue, most guidance counselors are not specifically trained to help a student who exhibits behavior that may indicate they might commit a violent act.

The National Association of School Psychologists recommends schools have one psychologist on-site for every 500 students, but the national average is only one psychologist for every 1,127 students. In Pennsylvania, the average is one school psychologist for every 1,022 students. New Jersey averages one psychologist for every 663 students, but that doesn´t meet the NASP standard, either.

Most students who need help don´t become a danger to others, but many harm themselves, and some die by suicide. Students´ mental health was further impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which closed schools, limited children´s interaction with peers, and increased their time on social media sites. U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy declared a mental health crisis among children in 2021 and issued another warning last year about social media´s adverse impact on young people.

School districts need more resources to intervene when they recognize a student needs mental health assistance. One avenue may be funding provided through a federal grant program that is part of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act signed into law last year by President Biden. It includes $1 billion to be competitively awarded to school districts implementing programs to “prevent and respond to acts of bullying, violence, and hate.”

Urgency, however, should also spur state and local governments and school boards to act beyond stringent security measures.

Schools not only need teachers, administrators, and support staff, they also need enough guidance counselors and mental health professionals on-site to help prevent a school from becoming the scene of an avoidable calamity.

ONLINE: website Roundup: United States

Posted on Leave a comment

Lainey Wilson is working with an A-list songbird

Country music star Lainey Wilson is working with a new A-list talent.

The Yellowstone actress will be collaborating with the blonde beauty – who has a link to Blake Shelton – on her next album Whirlwind.

On Tuesday, Wilson announced she will work with Miranda Lambert on the new song Good Horses which will be released this Friday, August 2. 

Wilson, Lambert, and Luke Dick wrote this song together. 

This is the first time Wilson has included a collaboration on one of her own projects and the first duet between the two artists. 

Good Horses follows the release of previous singles Hang Tight Honey, Country’s Cool Again, and 4x4xU.

Country music star Lainey Wilson is working with a new A-list talent. The Yellowstone actress will be collaborating with the blonde beauty – who has a link to Blake Shelton – on her next album Whirlwind. Seen July 11 

On Tuesday, Wilson announced she will work with Miranda Lambert on the new song Good Horses which will be released this Friday, August 2. Wilson, Lambert, and Luke Dick wrote this song together. Seen in May

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Lainey Wilson (@laineywilson)

Whirlwind is set to drop on August 23.

This comes after she talked Taylor Swift.

While making the rounds at the premiere of the new disaster film Twisters in Los Angeles, the singer was honored to find out that Swift is a fan of hers, and that the respect has been mutual through the years.  

‘I actually watched her perform at CMA Fest on the Riverfront stage when she was probably 15. I was 14, and I remember just thinking, man, this girl’s future is bright,’ Wilson, now 32, gushed about the then rising star. ‘And there was hardly anybody in the crowd except for me and my family’ 

Wilson added, ‘And I got to tell her that. And she was like, ‘There were, like, 16 people there.’ And I said, ‘Well, we were four of them.’

Read More

Channing Tatum praises ‘normal and sweet’ friend Taylor Swift who makes him ‘homemade pop tarts’

Wilson, now 32, moved from her hometown of Baskin, Louisiana to Nashville, Tennessee after graduating from high school to pursue a career as a country performer.

That’s when the singer-songwriter got to catch Swift at the CMA Fest.

She left the festival inspired by Swift’s performance, despite there only being a handful of people in the audience.

Wilson previously revealed how she was shocked to learn the 14-time Grammy Award winner was a fan of her music during an appearance on the Zach Sang Show podcast.

‘I told her, I said [that] ‘I truly respect her. I think she is freaking awesome,” Wilson told the host at the time. 

The Yellowstone actress went on to share how impressed she is with the heights of success Swift has reached at such a young age, and how she’s been able to sustain her connection with her millions of fans around the world.  

‘It’s just so cool to see how she’s done this,’ the Never Say Never star said, before adding, ‘I think she’s just a boss. I got to see her show this past year and just left there feeling so inspired.’

Following her debut, Swift has since released 10 more studio albums, which documents her transition from country music to a hybrid of country-pop, to all out pop music, and her interest in more folkier style in more recent years.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Lainey Wilson (@laineywilson)

This comes after she talked Taylor Swift . While making the rounds at the premiere of the new disaster film Twisters in Los Angeles , the singer was honored to find out that Swift is a fan of hers, and that the respect has been mutual through the years. Swift seen in 2007 

After telling Swift that she attended her show at CMS Fest in 2007, the Folklore star recalled, ‘There were, like, 16 people there,’ for which Wilson responded, ‘Well, we were four of them’

On top of that, she has also re-recorded four of six planned albums as a way to own her own music after her fallout with Scooter Braun after he purchased her entire music catalog via Big Machine Records.

After being inspired by Swift as a teen, Wilson went on to release her self-titled debut album on Cupit in 2014, and is now poised to drop her fifth album, Whirlwind, on August 23.

The two stars have another parallel in that they both are currently dating football players.

Wilson only just recently confirmed her romance with former Pittsburgh Steelers and LA Rams quarterback Devlin Hodges, 28, who now plays in the Canadian Football League (CFL) with the Ottawa Redblacks.

As for Swift, she’s been in a high-profile relationship with Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, 34, since September 2023. 

The Yellowstone actress is impressed with the heights of success Swift has reached at such a young age, and how she’s been able to sustain her connection with her fans around the world

Wilson’s ongoing Country’s Cool Again Tour, which began in late May this year, will continue on in North America through December.

Also on the road, Swift will continue on with The Eras Tour in Europe until late August, and then come back to the U.S. for concerts in Miami, New Orleans, and Indianapolis before going to Canada to wrap up the tour in Vancouver.

The Eras Tour kicked off in the United States back in March 2023.

Taylor SwiftLainey Wilson